Since the inception of international comparative tests in the 1960s, Japanese students, like most students around east Asia, have consistently outscored their Anglo-American peers (that is, the United Kingdom, the United States and Australia). The shift from TIMSS to PISA two decades ago – much touted by PISA advocates as the shift from regurgitation of curricular contents to ‘creative’ knowledge application in contemporary society – only revealed the continuing dominance of east Asian students. The PISA results were actually a surprise to many researchers, given stock images of east Asia as land of rote memorisation and regimes of ‘cramming’ test prep. Here it is worth recalling Ronald Dore’s characterisation of Japanese education – one of the earliest – dating from the mid-1970s:
‘It works; provided one think of it as an enormously elaborated, very expensive intelligence testing system with some educational spin-off, rather than the other way around… The examination hell sorts the sheep from the goats; a man who can’t take psychological strain would be of no use anyway.’
Indeed, this image of an ‘exam hell’ has consistently performed a double function in the Anglo-American educational discourse: assuring us that Japan performs, but only at a hefty psychological and social price, and that therefore there is very little we can learn from east Asian approaches.
However, our recent study shows that this stereotypical image of Japanese education, and by extension all of education in east Asia, is outdated (Komatsu and Rappleye 2018 forthcoming). Utilising data from PISA 2015, we made the following findings.
- Time spent in learning by Japanese secondary students has declined drastically over the past several decades.
- Study time among Japanese secondary students is currently roughly equal and perhaps even shorter than the time spent in learning by Anglo-American students.
Yet despite both these findings, achievement remains world class. Another interesting finding is that Japanese secondary students now spend less time in out-of-school learning than Anglo-American students. Our complementary study (Rappleye and Komatsu 2018) works in tandem with these new finding by showing how school-related anxiety and stress for Japanese secondary students are now comparable to those for Anglo-American students. All of this points to the fact that the well-worn ‘exam hell’ stereotype no longer matches the realities of Japanese education, and renders problematic the older view still uncritically recycled in educational research and popular discussions alike (see for example Marginson, 2011; Castle, 2016).
‘Our images of the obedient and diligent, but secretly stressed and uncreative, east Asian student has prevented us from thinking deeply about the alternatives that east Asia presents.’
Our images of the obedient and diligent, but secretly stressed and uncreative, east Asian student has prevented us from thinking deeply about the alternatives that east Asia presents. In fact, there is a consistent body of literature that has long attempted to challenge the dominant Anglo-American stereotypes (for instance, Francis and Archer 2005; Park 2013; Komatsu and Rappleye 2017; Rappleye and Komatsu 2017). Yet these have not made much headway in the Anglo-American debates, given the continued dominance of the ‘exam hell’ narrative.
Ultimately, we hope that east Asian education and thought can be taken seriously – that is, recognised as an onto-epistemic resource for deeper self-reflection (Takayama 2018), rather than relegated to exotica or empirical raw material within parochial Anglo-American debates.
Castle J-L (2016) ‘Top 10 exam rituals from stressed students across Asia’, BBC News website, 3 March 2016. http://www.bbc.com/news/business-35614030
Dore R (1976) The diploma disease: Education, qualification, and development, Berkeley: University of California Press
Francis B and Archer L (2005) ‘British-Chinese pupils’ and parents’ constructions of the value of education’, British Educational Research Journal 31(1): 89–108
Komatsu H and Rappleye J (2017) ‘A PISA paradox? An alternative theory of learning as a possible solution for variations in PISA scores’, Comparative Education Review 61(2): 269–297
Komatsu H and Rappleye J (2018 forthcoming) ‘Is Exam Hell the Cause of High Academic Achievement in East Asia? The Case of Japan and the Case for Transcending Stereotypes’, British Education Research Journal
Marginson S (2011) ‘Higher education in East Asia and Singapore: Rise of the Confucian Model’, Higher Education 61: 587–611
Park H (2013) Re-evaluating Education in Japan and Korea: Demystifying Stereotypes, Oxford: Routledge
Rappleye J and Komatsu H (2017) ‘How to make Lesson Study work in America and worldwide: A Japanese perspective on the onto-cultural basis of (teacher) education’, Research in Comparative and International Education 12(4): 398–430
Rappleye J and Komatsu H (2018 forthcoming) ‘Stereotypes as the Anglo-American Exam Ritual? Comparisons of students’ exam anxiety in East Asia, America, Australia, and the United Kingdom’, Oxford Review of Education
Takayama K (2018) ‘How to mess with PISA: Learning from Japanese kokugo curriculum experts’, Curriculum Inquiry 48(2): 220–237