Investigating classroom contexts for learning for pupils with special educational needs: Class size, groupings and interactions
Many countries follow policies of inclusion in which pupils with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) are, as far as possible, educated in mainstream settings. For the most part this is regarded as an admirable and socially just aim, but it can result in difficult decisions regarding school organisation, classroom management and teaching.
These decisions are likely to be affected by features of the classroom context, but there is very little systematic information on these features. Our new paper (Blatchford and Webster 2018) in the British Educational Research Journal argues that it is important to be aware of these educational contexts in which teachers teach, and which influence the appropriateness and effectiveness of pedagogical strategies. Our paper reports results from a systematic observation study on the educational experiences of pupils in mainstream primary and secondary schools. The aim of this study was to obtain detailed and comparable pictures, built up on the basis of a high number of moment-by-moment observations, of the classroom contexts for learning experienced by both pupils with SEND and average-attaining pupils without SEND. In particular, the study focussed on three main features: class size; grouping arrangements within and across classes; and pupils’ interactions with teachers, teaching assistants (TAs) and other pupils.
The main focus of our research was 48 pupils at Year 5 (aged 9–10) and 49 pupils at Year 9 (aged 13–14 years) who had Statements of SEND or Education, Health and Care Plans (EHCPs). For the purposes of comparison, we also collected data on 227 typically-developing pupils (115 pupils at Year 5; 112 pupils at Year 9). Data were collected over the 2011/12 and 2015/16 academic years, and amounted to a total of just under 68,000 observations made over 1,132 hours. As far as we know, this is the largest observational research project ever conducted in the UK on pupils with SEND.
Putting together the key results from the observations on class size, composition of adults and attainment grouping, we found that in Year 5, pupils with Statements/EHCPs were found to spend over a quarter of their time away from the mainstream class, the teacher and their peers. When they worked in groups, it was mostly with other pupils identified as low-attaining and/or as having SEND. The mainstream experience at Year 9 for pupils with high-level SEND featured more in-class, teacher-led teaching; they were taught mostly in whole classes with other low attainers and those with SEND. Pupils with Statements/EHCPs were typically taught in small, homogenous, low-attaining classes, with at least one TA present alongside the teacher. Their average-attaining peers, meanwhile, were taught in larger homogenous classes with just the teacher present.
‘At primary school, the educational experiences of pupils with SEND Statements and/or EHCPs are characterised by a high degree of separation from the classroom, teacher and peers – whereas in secondary settings they are characterised by a form of segregation.’
Taken together, the educational experiences of pupils with Statements/EHCPs at primary school are characterised by a high degree of separation from the classroom, teacher and peers, whereas in secondary settings, they are characterised by a form of segregation: a form of ‘streaming’, whereby lower-attaining pupils and those with SEND are taught alongside one another away from their average- and higher-attaining peers. The rationale for these organisational arrangements is ostensibly to assist struggling pupils, but their unintended consequences give us cause to carefully rethink classroom contexts for learning in mainstream schools.
Teacher quality is consistently identified as the most important school-related factor in pupil achievement, but what happens in the classroom, in terms of pedagogical approaches, is necessarily facilitated or inhibited by the often-overlooked factors of class size, grouping and the use of TAs. Compared with their typically-developing peers, our data show that these factors interact with the teaching and learning experiences of pupils with high-level SEND in quantitatively and qualitatively different ways. See Webster and Blatchford (2015) and Webster and Blatchford (2018) for more on the qualitative differences.
Our new paper discusses the value of an ecological approach to school learning, drawing on the work of Bronfenbrenner (1979) and Barker and Gump (1964), but our work suggests that we need to take this further and develop a view of classroom effects on learning that recognises and seeks to capture the interconnected nature of the contextual, interactive, and pedagogical features at work. We argue that class size, for example, is best conceived as a context for teaching and learning that interconnects with other classroom contextual features, like within-class groupings.
The search for the interconnections between classroom contextual factors and classroom interactions is important not only conceptually, but also in terms of policy and practice.
Barker R and Gump P (1964) Big School Small School, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
Blatchford P and Webster R (2018) ‘Classroom contexts for learning at primary and secondary school: Class size, groupings, interactions and special educational needs’, British Educational Research Journal
Bronfenbrenner U (1979) The Ecology of Human Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Webster R and Blatchford P (2018) ‘Making sense of “teaching”, “support” and “differentiation”: The educational experiences of pupils with Education, Health and Care Plans and Statements in mainstream secondary schools’, European Journal of Special Needs Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2018.1458474
Webster R and Blatchford P (2015) ‘Worlds apart? The nature and quality of the educational experiences of pupils with a Statement for special educational needs in mainstream primary schools’, British Educational Research Journal 41(2): 324–342. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/berj.3454
Peter Blatchford and Rob Webster’s original article in the British Educational Research Journal (BERJ), ‘Classroom contexts for learning at primary and secondary school: Class size, groupings, interactions and special educational needs’, is now free-to-view on Wiley Online.