Convenor

Gemma Moss
g.moss@ioe.ac.uk

For various historical, political and epistemological reasons (which are well-documented in a range of sources), ‘evidence-based policy’ is not a neutral descriptor but instead seems to have become a highly-charged and polarising idea in educational research, with different factions in the educational research community taking contrasting or even oppositional stances, based to some extent on pre-existing ideological and rhetorical positions and resulting in some theoretical and methodological stand-offs. This SIG, in taking a wider view of the relationship between research and policy, would seek to create an environment for robust and constructive engagement on how and under what circumstances educational research can and should seek to inform the processes of policy-making at different levels within the system. The SIG will draw upon a range of philosophical, conceptual and empirical understandings – including in the field of research utilisation and ‘impact’ – in order to (i) establish more nuanced and conducive ‘professional conversations’ and (ii) explore a variety of institutional arrangements, as a basis for developing and influencing research-informed policy-making. The SIG would therefore take especial care to include colleagues working in practice and policy, as well as from research, institutions; and to link up with other initiatives in this field, such as the Thematic Seminar Group funded as part of the ESRC Teaching and Learning Research Programme, the ESRC-funded Evidence Network, and various Social Research Association initiatives.

Aims and objectives of the group:

identifying and enhancing the various ways in which, and the supporting conditions under which, scholarly research efforts in education can have a stronger influence on policy-making processes, by, for example:

• - identifying key areas of policy which may be particularly supported, or contra-indicated, by current research evidence seen in the round;
• - identifying processes, environments and institutional arrangements for the mediation and ‘translation’ of research knowledge for decision-making;
• - de-constructing barriers to the use of scholarly research in decision-making;
• - exploring a range of methodologies for synthesising research knowledge;
• - identifying new substantive areas, new research models and modes, and/or insufficiently understood
  issues for policy-relevant research.